Optimization of the Cross-Member Thickness and its Effect of Torsional Rigidity

Shrikant D Yawalkar, Srinivasa Rao Pullivarti
International Journal of Analytical, Experimental and Finite Element Analysis
Volume 9: issue 4, December 2022, pp 62-69

Author's Information

Shrikant D Yawalkar1,2 

Corresponding Author
1Department of Mechanical Engineering Christian College of Engineering & Technology, Bhilai, India
shrikantyawalkar88@gmail.com

Srinivasa Rao Pullivarti2

2Department of Mechanical Engineering Christian College of Engineering & Technology, Bhilai, India
Article -- Peer Reviewed
Published online – 14 October 2022

Open Access article under Creative Commons License

Cite this article – Shrikant D Yawalkar, Srinivasa Rao Pullivarti, “Optimization of the Cross-Member Thickness and its Effect of Torsional Rigidity”, International Journal of Analytical, Experimental and Finite Element Analysis, RAME Publishers, vol. 9, issue 4, pp. 62-69, December 2022.
https://doi.org/10.26706/ijaefea.4.9.20221201

Abstract:-
According to the tadpole design, the vehicle will have two wheels up front and one wheel in the back. Because it is a perfect fit between the motorcycle and automobile categories, the vehicle must adhere to both motorcycle and automobile laws. The purpose of this project is to design a full-scale chassis concept based on modern and future requirements and regulations. In addition to this, the chassis should have a reasonable price without sacrificing the overall quality of the design. It was estimated that cross-members with a thickness of 200 mm were the best option for increasing the chassis torsional rigidity, and the basis of the chassis is constructed out of frames. It was observed that the C-shaped side members on the chassis were not as robust as the tubular truss side members when subjected to the vertical stresses.
Index Terms:-
Chassis, Dynamic stability, Mild steel, Torsional rigidity, CAD and Tadpole design .
REFERENCES
  1. A.A. Dere, M. Singh, A. Thakan, R. Kumar, H. Singh, Design optimization of gokart chassis frame using modal analysis, Adv. Metrol. Measurement Eng. Surf. (2020) 171–186.
    Crossref

  2. R.V. Patil, P.R. Lande, Y.P. Reddy, A.V. Sahasrabudhe, Optimization of three-wheeler chassis by linear static analysis, Mater. Today: Proc. 4 (8) (2017).
    Crossref

  3. V. Saplinova, I. Novikov, S. Glagolev, Design and specifications of racing car chassis as passive safety feature, Transp. Res. Procedia 50 (2020) 591–607.
    Crossref

  4. A.K. Ary, A.R. Prabowo, F. Imamuddin, Structural assessment of an energyefficient urban vehicle chassis using finite element analysis – a case study, Procedia Struct. Integrity 27 (2020) 69–76.
    Online

  5. N. Anas Mohammed, N.C. Nandu, A. Krishnan, A.R. Nair, P. Sreedharan, Design, analysis, fabrication and testing of a formula car chassis, Mater. Today: Proc. 5 (11, Part 3) (2018) 24944-24953.
    Crossref

  6. Mohd Hanif Mat, Amir Radzi Ab. Ghani, Design and analysis of ‘eco’ car chassis, Procedia Eng. 41 (2012) 1756–1760.
    Crossref

  7. P. Jeyapandiarajan, G. Kalaiarassan, J. Joel, R. Shirbhate, F.F. Telare, A. Bhagat, Design and analysis of chassis for an electric motorcycle, Mater. Today: Proc. 5 (5, Part 2) (2018) 13563-13573.
    Crossref

  8. N. Sinha, K. Kumar, Efficacy of vehicle chassis of polymeric composite, Mater. Today: Proc. 22 (Part 4) (2020) 2638-2646.
    Online

  9. M. Palanivendhan, S. Senthilkumar, J. Chandradass, V. Reddy, P. Raju, Design and development of hybrid chassis for two-wheeler motorcycle, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 993 012129.
    Crossref

  10. The Madison Area Transportation Planning Board. “Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Travel Time Estimation Approach”. MA thesis. Metropolitan Planning Organization, 2010.
    Online

  11. Engineering ToolBox. The drag coefficient of an object in a moving fluid influence drag force. - 2004.
    Online

  12. Easy Mile. EZ10. - 2015.
    Online

  13. Engineering ToolBox. Rolling friction and rolling resistance. - 2004.
    Online

  14. x-engineer. EV design – energy consumption. - 2020.
    Online

  15. Aisling Doyle & Tariq Muneer. Energy consumption and modelling of the climate control system in the electric vehicle. Oct. 2018.
    Crossref

  16. Anne Hakansson. “Portal of Research Methods and Methodologies for Research Projects and Degree Projects”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering FECS’13 (pp. 67-73). Las Vegas USA: CSREA Press U.S.A, 2013. Chap. 2.
    Online

  17. The Madison Area Transportation Planning Board. “Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Travel Time Estimation Approach”. MA thesis. Metropolitan Planning Organization, 2010.
    Online

  18. A. van Berkum. “Chassis and suspension design FSRTE02”. MA thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, 2006.
    Crossref

  19. V. Veloso, H.S.Magalhaes, G.I. Bicalho , E.S. Palma. “Failure investigation and stress analysis of a longitudinal stringer of an automobile chassis”, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol.16, PP 1696–1702, 2009.
    Crossref

  20. M.H.A. Bonte, A. de Boer, R. Liebregts, “Determining the von Mises stress power spectral density for frequency domain fatigue analysis including out-of-phase stress components”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol.302, PP 379–386, 2007.
    Crossref

  21. Yongjie Lu, Shaopu Yang, Shaohua Li, Liqun Chen, “Numerical and experimental investigation on stochastic dynamic load of a heavy-duty vehicle”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol.34, PP 2698– 2710, 2010.
    Crossref

  22. Cicek Karaoglu, N. Sefa Kuralay, “Stress analysis of a truck chassis with riveted joints”, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol.38, PP 1115–1130, 2002.
    Crossref

  23. K. Chinnaraj, M. Sathya Prasad, C. Lakshmana Rao, “Experimental Analysis and Quasi-Static Numerical Idealization of Dynamic Stresses on a Heavy Truck Chassis Frame Assembly”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol.13-14, PP 271–280, 2008.
    Crossref

  24. Johann Wannenburg, P. Stephan Heyns, Anton D. Raath, “Application of a fatigue equivalent static load methodology for the numerical durability assessment of heavy vehicle structures”, International Journal of Fatigue, Vol.31, PP 1541-1549, 2009.
    Crossref

  25. Ojo Kurdi, Roslan Abdul Rahman, “Finite Element Analysis of Road Roughness Effect on Stress Distribution of Heavy Duty Truck Chassis”, International Journal of Technology, Vol.1, PP 57-64, 2010.
    Crossref

  26. N.K.Ingole, D.V. Bhope, “Stress analysis of Tractor Trailer Chassis for self-weight reduction”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), Vol.3, No 9, 2011.
    Online

  27. S. Butdee, F. Vignat, “TRIZ method for light weight bus body structure design”, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing engineering, Vol.31, Issue 2, 2008.
    Online

  28. N V Dhandapani, G Mohan kumar, K K Debnath, “Static analysis of Off-High way vehicle Chassis structure for the effect of various stress distributions”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol.1, No 6, 2012.
    Online

  29. Roslan Abd Rahman, Mohd Nasir Tamin, Ojo Kurdi, “Stress analysis of Heavy duty truck Chassis as a preliminary data for its Fatigue life prediction using FEM”, Jurnal Mekanikal, Vol.26, PP 76-85, 2008.
    Online

  30. N V Dhandapani, G Mohan kumar, K K Debnath, “Static analysis of Off-High way vehicle Chassis structure for the effect of various stress distributions”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Technology, Vol.2, Issue 1, 2012.
    Online

To view full paper, Download here .

For authors

Author's guidelines Publication Ethics Publication Policies Artical Processing Charges Call for paper Frequently Asked Questions(FAQS)

Publishing with